Review process

All submissions are initially reviewed by the editor’s secretary who checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations.

Next,  the submitted article is reviewed by the editor-in-chief and/or any delegated member of the editorial committee who checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further by external reviewers. In some circumstances the editors may decide to consult the article with an appointed  member of the  Scientific Council.

If the article meets substantive and formal criteria it is sent to two independent reviewers invited  by editors who have initially reviewed it.

Both the author of the article and the reviewer remain anonymous during the whole review process (double-blind review process).

Reviewers’ comments are compiled and they either recommend or reject the article. They may also return the article to the author for further revision, and may include guidance for revisions required.

If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision whether to publish the article, request further major or minor revision or reject it.

The editor sends a copy of the review to the author and informs him/her  about the results of the review process. The author is required to reply to the reviewer’s  comments within the specified time, and either accept them or present relevant counterarguments. At this point, the author has the right to withdraw the submission.

If the author agrees with the reviewer’s comments, he/she is obliged to revise the article,  include all  constructive comments from the reviewers, and resubmit it within 14 days.

A list of all reviewers who cooperate with the journal is available on the journal’s website.


Formularz recenzji

Czasopismo „Iudaica Russica” 2020, nr 1 (4)

list of reviewers

Valentina Brio The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Izrael)
Marcin Cybulski Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Artur Czapiga Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
Ilona Dobosiewicz Uniwersytet Opolski
Katarzyna Jastrzębska Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Wiesław Krajka Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
Rina Lapidus Bar Ilan University (Izrael)
Zdeřka Nedomová Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě (Czechy)
Jadwiga Stawnicka Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
Jarosław Wierzbiński Uniwersytet Łódzki
Jacek Wiśniewski Uniwersytet Warszawski
Sławomir Jacek Żurek Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II


List of reviewers — 2019

Monika Adamczyk-Garbowska Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
Roman Katsman Bar-Ilan University (Izrael)
Izabella Malej Uniwersytet Wrocławski
Alicja Maślak-Maciejewska Instytut Judaistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Magdalena Ruta Instytut Judaistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Eleonora Szafrańska Moskiewski Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny (Rosja)
Maciej Tramer Uniwersytet Śląski
Maria Wojtak Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
Marta Zając Uniwersytet Śląski
Sławomir Jacek Żurek Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Piotr Fast Uniwersytet Śląski
Lara Sinielnikowa
Крымский федеральный университет им. В.И. Вернадского (Rosja)
Aleksandra Ponomariewa Южный Федеральный университет в Ростове-на-Дону (Rosja)
Witold Kowalczyk prof. emerytowany Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Katarzyna Jastrzębska Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Anna Polakowska  Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II


List of reviewers — 2018

Małgorzata Dubrowska Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Roman Katsman Bar-Ilan University (Izrael)
Paweł Sarna Uniwersytet Śląski
Anna Skotnicka-Maj Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Jacek Surzyn Uniwersytet Śląski
Justyna Tymieniecka-Suchanek Uniwersytet Śląski
Beata Waligórska-Olejniczak Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Sławomir Jacek Żurek Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II